<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elgg 1.09 in SVN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openedweb.com/blog/2008/10/16/elgg-109-in-svn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2008/10/16/elgg-109-in-svn/</link>
	<description>Education and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:52:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elgg 1.1 Released &#124; openedweb.com</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2008/10/16/elgg-109-in-svn/comment-page-1/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator>Elgg 1.1 Released &#124; openedweb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=451#comment-1459</guid>
		<description>[...] Elgg 1.09 in SVN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elgg 1.09 in SVN [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Werdmuller</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2008/10/16/elgg-109-in-svn/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Werdmuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=451#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>Yikes, we didn&#039;t expect this to be blogged so quickly. We do use svn as our main code repository - there isn&#039;t a hidden repository, as some projects use - so everything there is very much in progress. As Steve says above, please don&#039;t use it for production sites. (We haven&#039;t even had a chance to design the plugin reordering buttons as screengrabbed in the post.)

These developments lay the groundwork for a couple of things that we&#039;ll be revealing over the next while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes, we didn&#8217;t expect this to be blogged so quickly. We do use svn as our main code repository &#8211; there isn&#8217;t a hidden repository, as some projects use &#8211; so everything there is very much in progress. As Steve says above, please don&#8217;t use it for production sites. (We haven&#8217;t even had a chance to design the plugin reordering buttons as screengrabbed in the post.)</p>
<p>These developments lay the groundwork for a couple of things that we&#8217;ll be revealing over the next while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2008/10/16/elgg-109-in-svn/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=451#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>@jprieto They will update it to a release when it is more thoroughly tested. With any Open Source Software, there is a developers&#039; trunk where developers are constantly uploading new versions of various files. Changes can cause unexpected instability or introduce new bugs.

At a certain point, devs generally pack up the trunk for beta testing. Once enough people have tested it and the bugs are ironed out, it get released.

Working with trunk is risky and should not be done with production sites.

If you want to download the files, you need to get a subversion client which will download the files and overwrite changed files.

I plan on posting more about Elgg and SVN soon.

I am not recommending 1.09. I simply run trunk to test and to see what features are coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jprieto They will update it to a release when it is more thoroughly tested. With any Open Source Software, there is a developers&#8217; trunk where developers are constantly uploading new versions of various files. Changes can cause unexpected instability or introduce new bugs.</p>
<p>At a certain point, devs generally pack up the trunk for beta testing. Once enough people have tested it and the bugs are ironed out, it get released.</p>
<p>Working with trunk is risky and should not be done with production sites.</p>
<p>If you want to download the files, you need to get a subversion client which will download the files and overwrite changed files.</p>
<p>I plan on posting more about Elgg and SVN soon.</p>
<p>I am not recommending 1.09. I simply run trunk to test and to see what features are coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jprieto</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2008/10/16/elgg-109-in-svn/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>jprieto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=451#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>how come elgg does not update the download version to their latest version (ie 1.09) ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how come elgg does not update the download version to their latest version (ie 1.09) ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jprieto</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2008/10/16/elgg-109-in-svn/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>jprieto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=451#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>hi,
which files needs to be uploaded to obtain ver 1.09?

did you downloaded all files under the trunk directory? individually?

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
which files needs to be uploaded to obtain ver 1.09?</p>
<p>did you downloaded all files under the trunk directory? individually?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Splatzone</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2008/10/16/elgg-109-in-svn/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Splatzone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=451#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Nice! I always thought that the widgets on the dashboard were confusing, especially since it seems so similar to the profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! I always thought that the widgets on the dashboard were confusing, especially since it seems so similar to the profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
