<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WPMu 2.7.1 beta 1 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openedweb.com/blog/2009/04/06/wpmu-271-beta-1-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2009/04/06/wpmu-271-beta-1-released/</link>
	<description>Education and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 08:29:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matew</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2009/04/06/wpmu-271-beta-1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-5315</link>
		<dc:creator>Matew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=1274#comment-5315</guid>
		<description>On friday was released Beta 2 :) - http://ocaoimh.ie/2009/04/17/wordpress-mu-271-beta-2/
And there also are more improvements on trac.
Matew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On friday was released Beta 2 <img src='http://openedweb.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8211; <a href="http://ocaoimh.ie/2009/04/17/wordpress-mu-271-beta-2/" rel="nofollow">http://ocaoimh.ie/2009/04/17/wordpress-mu-271-beta-2/</a><br />
And there also are more improvements on trac.<br />
Matew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tradenet</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2009/04/06/wpmu-271-beta-1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-4986</link>
		<dc:creator>Tradenet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=1274#comment-4986</guid>
		<description>I agree with the &quot;additional pressure&quot;. Because  Donncha doesn&#039;t like to be pushed from what I see at the Mu forums. And frankly I don&#039;t blame him as well.  After all this is open source software. However,  that community of users always is a bit pushy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the &#8220;additional pressure&#8221;. Because  Donncha doesn&#8217;t like to be pushed from what I see at the Mu forums. And frankly I don&#8217;t blame him as well.  After all this is open source software. However,  that community of users always is a bit pushy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2009/04/06/wpmu-271-beta-1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-4985</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=1274#comment-4985</guid>
		<description>I saw that comment too. I don&#039;t think Donncha likes the additional pressure of having to move WPMu along to meet BuddyPress&#039;s needs. Can&#039;t say I blame him, but I&#039;m not sure that it would be nearly as interesting without the multi blog functionality. Full featured blogs set BuddyPress apart from Elgg.

Again, I think there is a real problem having progress predicated upon other projects to such a degree. That also gets us back to bbPress still being alpha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that comment too. I don&#8217;t think Donncha likes the additional pressure of having to move WPMu along to meet BuddyPress&#8217;s needs. Can&#8217;t say I blame him, but I&#8217;m not sure that it would be nearly as interesting without the multi blog functionality. Full featured blogs set BuddyPress apart from Elgg.</p>
<p>Again, I think there is a real problem having progress predicated upon other projects to such a degree. That also gets us back to bbPress still being alpha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tradenet</title>
		<link>http://openedweb.com/blog/2009/04/06/wpmu-271-beta-1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-4983</link>
		<dc:creator>Tradenet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openedweb.com/blog/?p=1274#comment-4983</guid>
		<description>Yeah, if you look at some of the comments at BuddyPress, Donncha is not particularly happy that they are &quot;relying&quot; on WPMu. The opinion is that both should be separate&quot;:

&quot;I know this has been said hundreds of times before, but it would be great to see BuddyPress breaking away from MU and towards regular WordPress&quot;.

http://buddypress.org/blog/news/rc-1-new-wordpress-mu-functionality/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, if you look at some of the comments at BuddyPress, Donncha is not particularly happy that they are &#8220;relying&#8221; on WPMu. The opinion is that both should be separate&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;I know this has been said hundreds of times before, but it would be great to see BuddyPress breaking away from MU and towards regular WordPress&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://buddypress.org/blog/news/rc-1-new-wordpress-mu-functionality/" rel="nofollow">http://buddypress.org/blog/news/rc-1-new-wordpress-mu-functionality/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

